[Zope-dev] Re: testing a meta-egg
On 2008-04-04 14:22:06 +0200, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 7:14 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
Is there a sane way (or recipe) out there that makes testing a
meta-eggs easier?
As I see now, I'll need to enter all dependent eggs as:
[test]
recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
eggs = my-meta-egg [test]
dep-egg-1 [test]
dep-egg-2 [test]
...
zope.interface [??test??]
Seems like buildout knows which eggs should be there.
This would be needed for a pre-installation test on the target system.
We need to make sure that all tests pass before going into production.
Any help is appreciated.
IMO, testing the dependent eggs isn't desirable, however, I don't
object to providing an option to do it.
It might be better to just provide a variable containing all the
dependent eggs like ${test:dependent-eggs}. You could do what ever you
want then.
--
Christian Zagrodnick
gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstrasse 29 · 06112 halle/saale
www.gocept.com · fon. +49 345 12298894 · fax. +49 345 12298891
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] Re: testing a meta-egg
On Apr 7, 2008, at 2:15 AM, Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
On 2008-04-04 14:22:06 +0200, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Apr 4, 2008, at 7:14 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
Is there a sane way (or recipe) out there that makes testing a
meta-eggs easier?
As I see now, I'll need to enter all dependent eggs as:
[test]
recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
eggs = my-meta-egg [test]
dep-egg-1 [test]
dep-egg-2 [test]
...
zope.interface [??test??]
Seems like buildout knows which eggs should be there.
This would be needed for a pre-installation test on the target
system.
We need to make sure that all tests pass before going into
production.
Any help is appreciated.
IMO, testing the dependent eggs isn't desirable, however, I don't
object to providing an option to do it.
It might be better to just provide a variable containing all the
dependent eggs like ${test:dependent-eggs}. You could do what ever
you want then.
How would that help?
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] Re: testing a meta-egg
On 2008-04-07 13:12:15 +0200, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It might be better to just provide a variable containing all the
dependent eggs like ${test:dependent-eggs}. You could do what ever you
want then.
How would that help?
Oh, when writing that mail I thought one could do
[test]
eggs = foo
${test:dependent-eggs}
But unfortunatly to understand recursion you have to undertand
recursion. So this would only work to test the dependent eggs of
another section. But forget about that.
Regards,
--
Christian Zagrodnick
gocept gmbh co. kg · forsterstrasse 29 · 06112 halle/saale
www.gocept.com · fon. +49 345 12298894 · fax. +49 345 12298891
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
