Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> -1
>
> The whole point of sticking with Zope2 is backward compatibility, isn't
> it? If I wanted something that doesn't run my old products and
> applications anymore I would go to Zope3 directly, why thank you.
Hey, the idea isn't to run Zope 3 directly but to evolve, re
-1
The whole point of sticking with Zope2 is backward compatibility,
isn't it? If I wanted something that doesn't run my old products and
applications anymore I would go to Zope3 directly, why thank you.
Please keep this in mind in your spree to make Zope2 look like Zope3.
Backward compat
Chris McDonough wrote:
>> As said, I think the first step towards unifying the request interfaces
>> would be to deprecate the __getattr__ protocol for request variables. I
>> think we should start with Zope 2.11.
>
> I'm sure you know this, but I wanted to point out that doing this will
> break a
On May 28, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 5/27/06, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've heard rumours that ultimately the preferred manner of
integration
of z2 and z3 requests was to replace the z2 ZPublisher with the z3
zope.publisher.
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've heard rumours that ultimately the preferred manner of integration
>> of z2 and z3 requests was to replace the z2 ZPublisher with the z3
>> zope.publisher.
>
> Well, that would not necessarily mean that the requests
