Re: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo

2012-02-07 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 13:07, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:  That would be great, for my part to be able to have the management tools (packing and such) in a separate package than the object browsing Excellent point. (and even the object actions, if you want to keep them, I don't

Re: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo

2012-02-06 Thread Sylvain Viollon
Hello, Op 6 feb 2012, om 10:26 heeft Lennart Regebro het volgende geschreven: This is at least an important attitude. I think also a future admin interface to a large extent should lose many of the ZMI concepts. For example, we need several management tools, like what is in the control

Re: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo

2012-02-06 Thread Christopher Lozinski
Very good point about different user types. Maybe we could have different permissions on the different roles, and people only get to see their version. Right now there is just a single ZMI permission. At least in Zope 2 that was the case. So I suggest we have 3 new roles. System

Re: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo

2012-02-06 Thread Sylvain Viollon
Hello, Op 6 feb 2012, om 17:06 heeft Christopher Lozinski het volgende geschreven: Very good point about different user types. Maybe we could have different permissions on the different roles, and people only get to see their version. Right now there is just a single ZMI permission.

Re: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo

2012-02-06 Thread Christopher Lozinski
Having different roles will help greatly yes, and even if we end up with multiple packages that would still be a great idea to have, but again, if I don't expect (want) my users to use this browsing interface at all, why should I load all its code when the server start ? That just

[Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo

2012-02-04 Thread Christopher Lozinski
On 2/1/12 10:39 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote: I wasn't able to get zam.demo (svn trunk) to run, so I don't have an opinion on ZAM itself at the moment. Note that Zope 4 is based on Zope 2 rather than BlueBream so I don't know how much of the existing work would still be applicable. Not being able

Re: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo

2012-02-04 Thread Roger
Hi Christopher -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: zope-dev-boun...@zope.org [mailto:zope-dev-boun...@zope.org] Im Auftrag von Christopher Lozinski Gesendet: Samstag, 4. Februar 2012 12:35 An: Laurence Rowe Cc: c...@gocept.com; zope-dev@zope.org Betreff: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo On 2