On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 13:07, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
That would be great, for my part to be able to have the management tools
(packing and such) in a separate package than the object browsing
Excellent point.
(and even
the object actions, if you want to keep them, I don't
Hello,
Op 6 feb 2012, om 10:26 heeft Lennart Regebro het volgende geschreven:
This is at least an important attitude.
I think also a future admin interface to a large extent should lose
many of the ZMI concepts. For example, we need several management
tools, like what is in the control
Very good point about different user types. Maybe we could have
different permissions on the different roles, and people only get to see
their version. Right now there is just a single ZMI permission. At
least in Zope 2 that was the case.
So I suggest we have 3 new roles.
System
Hello,
Op 6 feb 2012, om 17:06 heeft Christopher Lozinski het volgende geschreven:
Very good point about different user types. Maybe we could have
different permissions on the different roles, and people only get to see
their version. Right now there is just a single ZMI permission.
Having different roles will help greatly yes, and even if we end up with
multiple packages that would still be a great idea to have, but again, if I
don't
expect (want) my users to use this browsing interface at all, why should I
load all its code when the server start ?
That just
On 2/1/12 10:39 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
I wasn't able to get zam.demo (svn trunk) to run, so I don't have an
opinion on ZAM itself at the moment. Note that Zope 4 is based on Zope
2 rather than BlueBream so I don't know how much of the existing work
would still be applicable.
Not being able
Hi Christopher
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: zope-dev-boun...@zope.org [mailto:zope-dev-boun...@zope.org] Im
Auftrag
von Christopher Lozinski
Gesendet: Samstag, 4. Februar 2012 12:35
An: Laurence Rowe
Cc: c...@gocept.com; zope-dev@zope.org
Betreff: [Zope-dev] ZAM/ZMI Demo
On 2