Hello Jim,
Sounded like a good idea at first, but now you opened my eyes.
I guess I'll stick with the manually added eggs for the tests.
Thanks.
Friday, April 4, 2008, 3:08:27 PM, you wrote:
JF> I wouldn't want anyone doing this who wasn't willing to spend the time
JF> becoming fairly familiar
On Apr 4, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Jim,
Friday, April 4, 2008, 2:22:06 PM, you wrote:
JF> IMO, testing the dependent eggs isn't desirable, however, I don't
JF> object to providing an option to do it.
How do you propose or in fact how do you do testing just before going
into
Hello Jim,
Friday, April 4, 2008, 2:22:06 PM, you wrote:
JF> IMO, testing the dependent eggs isn't desirable, however, I don't
JF> object to providing an option to do it.
How do you propose or in fact how do you do testing just before going
into production?
Would you please give some hints ho
On Apr 4, 2008, at 7:14 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
Is there a sane way (or recipe) out there that makes testing a
meta-eggs easier?
As I see now, I'll need to enter all dependent eggs as:
[test]
recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
eggs = my-meta-egg [test]
dep-egg-1 [test]
dep-egg-2
Hello,
Is there a sane way (or recipe) out there that makes testing a
meta-eggs easier?
As I see now, I'll need to enter all dependent eggs as:
[test]
recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
eggs = my-meta-egg [test]
dep-egg-1 [test]
dep-egg-2 [test]
...
zope.interface [??test??