Hi,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:37:33 +0200
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Perhaps one way to make the ZMI and optional package is to aggregate the
relevant ZMI code into a smaller amount of packages (or a single
package), for instance zmi.core. The benefit of doing that is that
Yusei TAHARA wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:37:33 +0200
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Perhaps one way to make the ZMI and optional package is to aggregate the
relevant ZMI code into a smaller amount of packages (or a single
package), for instance zmi.core. The
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:10:44 +0200
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Then I'll take this way for now. Maybe z3c.zmi.core would be good?
Flat is better than nested (see the Zen of Python). I'd say go for
zmi.core; z3c isn't necessary.
Thanks. I will use the name zmi.core and
Yusei TAHARA wrote:
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:10:44 +0200
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Then I'll take this way for now. Maybe z3c.zmi.core would be good?
Flat is better than nested (see the Zen of Python). I'd say go for
zmi.core; z3c isn't necessary.
Thanks. I will use
Hi there,
In the whole discussion about Zope 3 I saw very few people speak up for
the Zope 3 ZMI.
So, who finds the Zope 3 ZMI useful? What parts of it do you find
useful? Are you interested in helping maintain it?
Note that I'm talking about the concrete Zope 3 ZMI here, not the
general
Hello there,
* 2009-04-14 18:35, Martijn Faassen wrote:
So, who finds the Zope 3 ZMI useful? What parts of it do you find useful?
Are you interested in helping maintain it?
We use the ZMI to manage applications, where applications are instances of
a content object stored in the ZODB. All in
Hey Fabio,
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2009-04-14 18:35, Martijn Faassen wrote:
So, who finds the Zope 3 ZMI useful? What parts of it do you find useful?
Are you interested in helping maintain it?
We use the ZMI to manage applications, where applications are instances of
a content object
Hello,
* 2009-04-14 19:35, Martijn Faassen wrote:
It might be an easier way to maintain this concept is to write a simple
UI for Zope 3 that only cares about installation of applications? It'd be
much less involved than all the ZMI code we currently have to worry
about.
I'd be curious to
I use zmi as a basic ui for viewing objects bacause we get basic views
for some default content, navigating the object store, and configuring
local security settings on objects, and configuring per instance tools.
And this is mainly because in the early stages of our projects we haven't built
the
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:34:47 +0200
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
So, who finds the Zope 3 ZMI useful? What parts of it do you find
useful? Are you interested in helping maintain it?
For me, the ZMI is useful to managing local components, security settings,
making views
10 matches
Mail list logo
