I summarized (my/our) current knowledge about the requirements of
compiling win binaries at
http://wiki.zope.org/ztk/CompilingForWindows
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZERmailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Adam GROSZER wrote:
How do you used to build binaries for windowze?
I mean which compilers do you use? mingw32? MS?
Ohhh and don't forget win64 ;-)
and various python version, like from 2.4 up to 3.1.
I did a few releases just using mingw32. I think it is the best
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Adam GROSZER wrote:
How do you used to build binaries for windowze?
I mean which compilers do you use? mingw32? MS?
Ohhh and don't forget win64 ;-)
and various python version,
On Thursday 29 April 2010, Baiju M wrote:
I did a few releases just using mingw32. I think it is the best we can do
for now that scales. As for Python versions, you simply have to
installthem all and go through the dance.
Does mingw32 works for 64 bit also ?
If you can isntall it on
Hello Stephan,
Thursday, April 29, 2010, 3:45:13 PM, you wrote:
SR On Thursday 29 April 2010, Baiju M wrote:
I did a few releases just using mingw32. I think it is the best we can do
for now that scales. As for Python versions, you simply have to
installthem all and go through the dance.
Hello,
How do you used to build binaries for windowze?
I mean which compilers do you use? mingw32? MS?
Ohhh and don't forget win64 ;-)
and various python version, like from 2.4 up to 3.1.
--
Best regards,
Adam GROSZER mailto:agros...@gmail.com
--
Quote of the day:
The
On Apr 26, 2005, at 2:22, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see:
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.233.184.203
Yeah this goes to show that you have to be extremely careful in
Great. And the current situation doesn't even catch too much spam. We're
relying on some central spam filtering infrastructure here. Looks like I
got to tune it again...
Am Montag, den 25.04.2005, 17:46 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters:
You should really be using SpamBayes 0.9 wink.
--
gocept gmbh
Howdy,
Am Montag, den 25.04.2005, 16:37 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters:
AFAIK, nobody looks at WinBuilders between releases. It's
traditionally been the job of whoever builds the Windows installer to
sort out whatever troubles WinBuilders has gotten into since the last
release. Certainly most
...
[Tim Peters]
What exactly do you do to run tests? This is exactly what I do:
svn up
python setup.py build_ext -i
python test.py -vv --all
[Christian Theune]
I go to the build directory of the WinBuilders and run bin/test.py
1. Is there a reason to _expect_ that to work? The
Howdy,
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2005, 11:38 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters:
[Christian Theune]
I go to the build directory of the WinBuilders and run bin/test.py
1. Is there a reason to _expect_ that to work? The WinBuilders
README.txt doesn't claim that it should. Would sure be nice
if
Sticking to this thread ...
Now the unit tests look like this:
==
ERROR: testCorrectFactories
(zope.app.publisher.browser.tests.test_directoryreso
urce.Test)
--
Sticking to this thread ...
Now the unit tests look like this:
The Zope trunk test_http_factory and test_webdav_source_factory tests
have been failing on Windows this way since last October (even when
running tests from a checkout tree). See:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1728
[Tim]
2. Which Python do you use to run bin\test.py? I hope you're using
bin\python.exe for that attempt anyway.
[Christian]
The one test.py refers to. (Yep, still tapping around blindly.)
I'm not following. #! lines don't mean anything on Windows, and
that's the only sense in which I
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2005, 12:57 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters:
[Tim]
2. Which Python do you use to run bin\test.py? I hope you're using
bin\python.exe for that attempt anyway.
[Christian]
The one test.py refers to. (Yep, still tapping around blindly.)
I'm not following. #!
[Tim]
2. Which Python do you use to run bin\test.py? I hope you're using
bin\python.exe for that attempt anyway.
[Christian]
The one test.py refers to. (Yep, still tapping around blindly.)
[Tim]
I'm not following. #! lines don't mean anything on Windows, and
[Christian]
I think cygwin
[Tim]
Someone with setup.py courage needs to step up to the plate then. The
[...] possibly work either so long as setup.py neglects to install necessary
files.
[Christian]
Yuppie did
[Tim]
That's not my understanding. My understanding (confirmed by
eyeballing the checkins) is that Yuppie
--On Dienstag, 26. April 2005 23:55 Uhr +0200 Christian Theune
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas: Can you please consider a beta2 instead of a rc as the next
step? Thanks.
You mean 2.8 b2? The next scheduled 2.8 release is b2 according to the
posted release
plan *wink*.
-aj
pgpbxpUn0lQjr.pgp
Hi,
and again, I got to complain about building Zope on Windows. This time
it's the 2.8 branch again with the 2.8b1 release.
It looks like the WinBuilders aren't taken care for at all. The ZClass
tests didn't got into the procedure of getting packaged so I had to copy
those files manually for
[Christian Theune]
and again, I got to complain about building Zope on Windows.
This time it's the 2.8 branch again with the 2.8b1 release.
It looks like the WinBuilders aren't taken care for at all.
AFAIK, nobody looks at WinBuilders between releases. It's
traditionally been the job of
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:37:01 -0400
From: Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1
Cc: zope-dev@zope.org
- Message truncated -
You should really
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL -- the attempt to send my last msg to Christian from my gmail
account got blocked:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical details
22 matches
Mail list logo
