Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

2012-12-03 Thread Adam GROSZER

Hello,

On 12/02/2012 02:55 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer nore...@zope.org wrote:

...


[1]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069693.html


[2]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069694.html


[3]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069695.html


[4]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069696.html


This is due to the release yesterday.

I can and will fix this, by providing a test extra, but this will only
cause no tests to run.  The fix may be needed for test of third-party
packages that depend on ZODB3 [test].

The winbot needs to be modified to run the tests for persistent,
BTrees, ZODB and ZEO separately.


I think the winbot does the right job.
Those tests are running against

svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/trunk

Now the tests pass as you added [test] back:

Total: 3407 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors in 5 minutes 15.068 seconds.

http://winbot.zope.org/builders/ZODB_dev%20py_265_win32/builds/861/steps/test/logs/stdio

I just need to add a builder for ZEO now

--
Best regards,
 Adam GROSZER
--
Quote of the day:
How you look depends on where you go.
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

2012-12-03 Thread Jim Fulton
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Adam GROSZER agroszer...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,


 On 12/02/2012 02:55 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer nore...@zope.org
 wrote:

 ...

 [1]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32

 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069693.html


 [2]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64

 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069694.html


 [3]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32

 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069695.html


 [4]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64

 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069696.html


 This is due to the release yesterday.

 I can and will fix this, by providing a test extra, but this will only
 cause no tests to run.  The fix may be needed for test of third-party
 packages that depend on ZODB3 [test].

 The winbot needs to be modified to run the tests for persistent,
 BTrees, ZODB and ZEO separately.


 I think the winbot does the right job.
 Those tests are running against

 svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/trunk

 Now the tests pass as you added [test] back:

Ah, there was a bug in the buildout config, which I just fixed.
There's no way that ZODB should be depending on ZODB3,
even in the buildout.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

2012-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer nore...@zope.org wrote:

...

 [1]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069693.html


 [2]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069694.html


 [3]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069695.html


 [4]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069696.html

This is due to the release yesterday.

I can and will fix this, by providing a test extra, but this will only
cause no tests to run.  The fix may be needed for test of third-party
packages that depend on ZODB3 [test].

The winbot needs to be modified to run the tests for persistent,
BTrees, ZODB and ZEO separately.


 [5]FAILED  winbot / zc.lockfile_py_265_32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069675.html

I'll look at this today.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

2012-12-02 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/02/2012 08:55 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer
 nore...@zope.org wrote:
 
 ...
 
 [1]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32 
 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069693.html



 
[2]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069694.html



 
[3]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069695.html



 
[4]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069696.html

 
 This is due to the release yesterday.
 
 I can and will fix this, by providing a test extra, but this will
 only cause no tests to run.  The fix may be needed for test of
 third-party packages that depend on ZODB3 [test].
 
 The winbot needs to be modified to run the tests for persistent, 
 BTrees, ZODB and ZEO separately.
 
 
 [5]FAILED  winbot / zc.lockfile_py_265_32 
 https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069675.html

 
 I'll look at this today.

If ZODB3 no longer has tests (as a pure meta-package), then dropping the
'test' dependency and changing the buldout.cfg accordingly seems correct.
 If you want to allow thrid-party pacakges to use the '[test]' extra, you
could have it depend on the corresponding extras (if any) for the
underlying real packages.


Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlC7gpIACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7tEQCfRxFDioiJ51o+WWnZIh05daxv
5ZgAn04Xe61mG8TVbW26agkfYroBf5Ng
=8Uhh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

2012-12-02 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/02/2012 11:32 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:

 If ZODB3 no longer has tests (as a pure meta-package), then dropping
 the 'test' dependency and changing the buldout.cfg accordingly seems
 correct. If you want to allow thrid-party pacakges to use the '[test]'
 extra, you could have it depend on the corresponding extras (if any)
 for the underlying real packages.

Oops, I missed seeing that you had already done the latter.


Tres.
- -- 
===
Tres Seaver  +1 540-429-0999  tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlC7gzcACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ4+pgCfVa9dX45r+4R9VAwArOPLYcOV
7nIAn3aJ6RbHZvSYmSg5jahDiBaOv7q/
=8PQR
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

2012-12-02 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
...
 If ZODB3 no longer has tests (as a pure meta-package), then dropping the
 'test' dependency and changing the buldout.cfg accordingly seems correct.
  If you want to allow thrid-party pacakges to use the '[test]' extra, you
 could have it depend on the corresponding extras (if any) for the
 underlying real packages.

Yup, in the long run, bit in the short run, I don't want to break packages that
depend on ZODB3 [test]. I released a2 which ads back this extra.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

2012-12-01 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2012-11-30 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-12-01 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received


   Successful - zopetoolkit_trunk - Build # 93
   Successful - zopetoolkit_trunk_app - Build # 77
   Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.7.3 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
[1]winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
[2]winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
[3]winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
[4]winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[5]winbot / zc.lockfile_py_265_32
[6]winbot / zope.app.i18n_py_265_32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--

[1]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069693.html


[2]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069694.html


[3]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069695.html


[4]FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069696.html


[5]FAILED  winbot / zc.lockfile_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069675.html


[6]FAILED  winbot / zope.app.i18n_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069697.html


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )