On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
Right,
I really like the idea of these things but I am concerned about something that
allows anonymous users to futz with traversal.
Can someone put my fears to rest that using these won't let anonymous users do
bad things to my sites?
I use
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:24:54 +, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I really like the idea of these things but I am concerned about something that
allows anonymous users to futz with traversal.
Can someone put my fears to rest that using these won't let anonymous users do
bad things to
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:30:26 + (GMT), Matt Hamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use them in conjunction with Apache's mod_proxy to rewrite
http://www.simpledomain.com to the long
http://zopehost.foo.com/blah/blah/VirtualHostMonstser/blah/blah. The Zope
host is behind a firewall, so
Then again, there's the advantage of having something
included as a standard part of Zope.
Yes, thats true. I would like to see this being rolled into the standard
zope (and there is a Collector entry saying that), although I think its
unlikely given the 'competition' from VHM.
Having said
From: "Chris Withers" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, it's easy enough to find out if a site is running Zope, then this
becomes
pretty easy attack to think of
I'm not going to claim that this is perfectly harmless, but I can't think of
any way in which this could be termed an "attack". You can
