Leonardo,
Have you looked at
http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/HowTos/zopeinstall/ZOPE-INSTALL-HOWTO
?
> -Original Message-
> From: Leonardo Kenji Shikida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 7:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope-
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 11:39:47AM +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
> Is nobody always user/group 99 on unix systems in general?
As Chris pointed out, it's not. It's not on my Debian system. Just untar
without preserving the username and group.
--
Martijn Pieters
| Software Engineermai
in this case, apache installation seems to be magically perfect :^)
or, in other words, zope is a great tool, but still needs a better
installation.
K.
> hi all,
>
> from my own experience i know user nobody is 99 and group nobody is the
> same on linux, but BSDs seem to have another convention
magically be perfect.
jens
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Steve Alexander
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 06:40
> To: Alexandre A. Drummond Barroso
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope-dev
"Alexandre A. Drummond Barroso" wrote:
>
> It would be a good idea to change the user/group that
> owns any file in the Zope tree to nobody.nobody before
> packaging the product (src and linux packages) instead
> of delivering with user 509. When this user number is
> already used, and someone is
