Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Gary Poster
Hi Thomas. Very cool that you are working on zc.dict + zc.blist. The updateOrder API is a sucky API for blists, as I'm sure you've realized. :-) FWIW, I seem to recall that Plone has a reasonable-to-nice API for changing order in containers, and the API would be able to take much better

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Thomas Lotze
Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com schrieb: Hi Thomas. Very cool that you are working on zc.dict + zc.blist. Better than letting that branch get old ;o) The updateOrder API is a sucky API for blists, as I'm sure you've realized. :-) It is sucky even when used with a PersistentList; it's

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Thomas Lotze
Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com schrieb: Yes, and I think that we're talking about two steps here anyway. I'd like to finish and release a version that uses BLists ASAP; Well, I think the switch to BLists is finished, so I'd be ready to merge it to the trunk after someone reviewed the changes. In

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Gary Poster
On Dec 23, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Thomas Lotze wrote: Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com schrieb: Yes, and I think that we're talking about two steps here anyway. I'd like to finish and release a version that uses BLists ASAP; Well, I think the switch to BLists is finished, so I'd be ready to merge

Re: [Zope-dev] [Checkins] SVN: zc.dict/branches/tlotze-blist/src/zc/dict/ordered.txt added a test to ensure the order is stored in a BList

2008-12-23 Thread Thomas Lotze
Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com schrieb: OK. I'll give it a whirl sometime over the next couple of weeks, if that's soon enough for you. Sure. FWIW, I'd be strongly tempted to release *without* the generation code, and leave it up to users to switch as they desire. Fine with me. I'm