kapil thangavelu wrote:
twisted is GPL and zope is not gpl compatible and that does not appear to be
changing despite some mention from zc about trying to achieve compatiblity.
Twisted is LGPL, and it might be possible to license it under something that
will work with ZPL. I don't think
There is another approach however for getting Java and Zope together
A few weeks back I was mucking around with the Python Java Extension
(see Python 9 proceedings) and was able to interact with Java
classes/instances directly from Zope by calling ExternalMethods. PJE
basically allows the
to be solved (if it hasn't already).
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Tim Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] A modest proposal: Replace medusa with Twisted
There is another approach however
Phil Harris wrote:
That said, I think JPE/PJE is the best way forward, but this problem needs
to be solved (if it hasn't already).
Latest CVS README says:
Multithreading
==
Multithreading issues are taken care of.
There is still a known issues concerning process termination
On Thursday 11 October 2001 03:30 am, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
kapil thangavelu wrote:
twisted is GPL and zope is not gpl compatible and that does not appear to
be changing despite some mention from zc about trying to achieve
compatiblity.
Twisted is LGPL, and it might be possible
People waste much more time arguing about the GPL license, than it would
take for them to completely rewrite the entire Python and Zope code base
from scratch under the GPL.
So if you can't live with a non-GPL license, then instead of arguing about
it, get yourself to work rewriting a new system
Hmhm, that is cool, I'll take another look then :)
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Shtull-Trauring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] A modest proposal: Replace medusa with Twisted
Phil Harris wrote:
That said
Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
Actually, this brings up this idea I had - Zope should replace medusa with
Twisted.
Well, you're advocating this, so it's fair to paint a rosy picture.
Can anyone see what the downsides would be?
In any case, it does look cool. Perhaps a fishbowl proposal would
Oops, forgot the URL: http://www.twistedmatrix.com/
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Designing the webpages of tomorrow http://webme-eng.com
Designing the MMORPGS of tomorrow http://worldforge.org
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
Actually, this brings up this idea I had - Zope should replace medusa with
Twisted. Why, you ask?
Any ideas what the
Hi Itamar,
this sounds good for me. One would have to see it
in the wild. Would you be able to do a sample integration
for testing?
At the same time unmeshing the publishing process sounds
sexy to me...
Regards
Tino
--On Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2001 12:11 +0200 Itamar Shtull-Trauring
[EMAIL
want to comment on that.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Phil Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Itamar Shtull-Trauring
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] A modest proposal
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 16:05:06 +0200
Itamar Shtull-Trauring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Plugging in a different transports instead of TCP (e.g. SSL) is much
easier in Twisted than medusa, as far as I can tell. In m2crypto's medusa
ssl code very protocol needs its own subclass in order supports
On Wednesday 10 October 2001 08:09 am, Michel Pelletier wrote:
Just to throw out another idea, Amos has discussed with me in the past the
idea of replacing medusa with Apache 2.0. Compelling as many of Twisted's
features may be, Apache 2.0 as far as i can tell supports many of them as
well
14 matches
Mail list logo
