Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Casey Duncan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Last-modified and bobobase_modification_time
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Toby Dickenson wrote:
In either case, Zope's current implementation needs
Wei He wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Dieter Maurer wrote:
R. David Murray writes:
...
Well, there's two aspects to this. The first one is the quesiton of
*why* the last modified header is currently that of the outermost
page template. That's a [EMAIL PROTECTED] question. The second
Wei He wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
Would please go a little bit deeper giving an example what information
HEAD requests don't pass to the server, although it's beyond this topic.
HEAD requests are required to have no side effects. On the other hand
they are required
Rendering may produce side effects. But HEAD requests
are required by HTTP not to have side effects.
RFC 2616 section 9.4 states that HEAD is identical to GET in this respect,
and both should have no side effects.
On Tuesday 18 Jun 2002 10:26 am, Wei He wrote:
I think the last step is
Toby Dickenson wrote:
Rendering may produce side effects. But HEAD requests
are required by HTTP not to have side effects.
RFC 2616 section 9.4 states that HEAD is identical to GET in this respect,
and both should have no side effects.
On Tuesday 18 Jun 2002 10:26 am, Wei He
Wei He writes:
...
2. From the website developers' point of view, there are already many
guidlines on how to create a good webpage. Among them are using the HTTP
Last-modification header to take the advantages of client cache.
I think you overestimate the importance of accurate
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Wei He writes:
...
2. From the website developers' point of view, there are already many
guidlines on how to create a good webpage. Among them are using the HTTP
Last-modification header to take the advantages of client cache.
I think you
BTW: This list if for development *of* Zope, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is
better for questions bout developing *with* Zope.
Thanks for your codes indeed. I posted it here because I thought only
people have high developing skill care about whether their web
pages are up-to-date to
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Chris Withers wrote:
BTW: This list if for development *of* Zope, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is
better for questions bout developing *with* Zope.
Thanks for your codes indeed. I posted it here because I thought only
people have high developing skill care about
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Chris Withers wrote:
Why do you think that? Surely all zope users will care about this? ;-)
Besides, that's not the point, re-read Casey's email more carefully...
Although I'm new to Zope, I'm not new to mailing list. I know the
mailing list rule but I just don't agree
On 14 Jun 2002, Casey Duncan wrote:
BTW: This list if for development *of* Zope, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is
better for questions bout developing *with* Zope.
Thanks for your codes indeed. I posted it here because I thought only
people have high developing skill care about whether their
BTW: This list if for development *of* Zope, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is
better for questions bout developing *with* Zope.
On to your question:
There is no automatic way in which DTML can do this for you. This is
simply because dtml-var foo doesn't tell Zope what foo is. Is it a
document or a
Casey Duncan wrote:
BTW: This list if for development *of* Zope, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is
better for questions bout developing *with* Zope.
On to your question:
There is no automatic way in which DTML can do this for you. This is
simply because dtml-var foo doesn't tell Zope what
13 matches
Mail list logo