Jim Fulton wrote:
snip
3. Use a hybrid schema. I'll call this the encapsulated base
scheme.
snip
Is it possible for the hybrid schema to generate a 'deprecation' warning
for each instance of a class that doesn't match the requirements of the
C3 resolution order when Zope is first started,
I am also very, very worried about breaking b/w compatibility in Zope 2.
I am responsible for about 15 sites, with say 10 distinct products
each. Are you saying I have to evaluate/upgrade 150 products because I
want to go to Zope 2.8(9)? No customer is going to pay for that effort
(and I will
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 12:18:47PM +0100, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
| I am also very, very worried about breaking b/w compatibility in Zope 2.
|
| I am responsible for about 15 sites, with say 10 distinct products
| each. Are you saying I have to evaluate/upgrade 150 products because I
| want to
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:14:27PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Thoughts?
|
| I am worried enough about breaking products that I'm inclined to go
| with option 3.
|
| Does anybody think we ought to use the new algorithm (option 2)?
I'm for option 2. Given that a huge amount of software that is
I am worried enough about breaking products that I'm inclined to go
with option 3.
Does anybody think we ought to use the new algorithm (option 2)?
I think we should use the new algorithm. However, I don't have any
products that I would be responsible for updating and maintaining. I'd
be
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
I am worried enough about breaking products that I'm inclined to go
with option 3.
Does anybody think we ought to use the new algorithm (option 2)?
I think we should use the new algorithm. However, I don't have any
products that I would be responsible for updating and
| Ohkay. If anyone has a problem, I'll send them to you and Sidnei. :)
/me takes his iBook and a plane to The Amazon
| Note that, in many cases, the people having problems will *not* be the
| product authors. They'll be people who just want to upgrade thier Zope
| installationa that use
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 13:52, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| I personally don't like the new algorithm, but I don't really care
| in the long run. One should avoid inheritence complex enough to show
| a difference.
I hearthly agree here.
Home domestic of you wink.
I do like the new algorithm, but
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| Ohkay. If anyone has a problem, I'll send them to you and Sidnei. :)
/me takes his iBook and a plane to The Amazon
| Note that, in many cases, the people having problems will *not* be the
| product authors. They'll be people who just want to upgrade thier Zope
|
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:14:27PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Thoughts?
|
| I am worried enough about breaking products that I'm inclined to go
| with option 3.
|
| Does anybody think we ought to use the new algorithm (option 2)?
I'm for option 2. Given that a huge amount
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 02:46:51PM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Most of the time, this is the same people who can't update their
| products, so if they *do* want a new zope, they will need to get a new
| product as well. I think its safe to make that assumption.
|
| I don't follow this. What do
Jim Fulton wrote at 2003-10-31 12:14 -0500:
...
Thoughts?
I am worried enough about breaking products that I'm inclined to go
with option 3.
Does anybody think we ought to use the new algorithm (option 2)?
Please do not use the new algorithm (option 2).
I like (multiple)
12 matches
Mail list logo
