Benji York wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
maybe time to merge zope-dev and zope3-dev?
-1
They're still different enough that most traffic on one is not
interesting to the majority of subscribers to the other.
Can you explain what lead you to this conclusion?
It seems to be the complete oppos
Chris Withers wrote:
maybe time to merge zope-dev and zope3-dev?
-1
They're still different enough that most traffic on one is not
interesting to the majority of subscribers to the other.
--
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
___
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 07:20, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
> > [aside... hmmm, crossposting, maybe time to merge zope-dev and
> > zope3-dev? most stuff seems to be relevent to both nowadays]
>
> +10
Okay, I hope this would be ignored, but -1. I can still ignore ma
Chris Withers wrote:
> [aside... hmmm, crossposting, maybe time to merge zope-dev and
> zope3-dev? most stuff seems to be relevent to both nowadays]
+10
You know, I once had a proposal. Uh, never mind :)
>> In Zope 3, we went with a more explicit installation mechanism,
>> in which people ha
[aside... hmmm, crossposting, maybe time to merge zope-dev and
zope3-dev? most stuff seems to be relevent to both nowadays]
Jim Fulton wrote:
In Zope 3, we went with a more explicit installation mechanism,
in which people had to explicitly cause a package's ZCML files to be
loaded for it to be
