Evan Simpson wrote:
>
> "aimed at"? This will pass the dictionary as a single positional parameter.
> It won't do anything with bound names or keyword parameters.
Cool, that's what I meant... I just wondered if the way I was calling it might
have had something to do with cotnext not being bound
From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm calling a python script with the context bound to, lets say, 'fred'.
> I call the python script like this:
>
> result = self.aq_acquire(variable_containing_name_of_PS)(a_dictionary)
>
> ...where self is an instance of my python product, and a_dictionar
From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cool :-) And even though I pass it in as _, it'll get bound to whatever is
> specified on the bindings tab, right?
Nope. If you called it "fred" on the bindings tab, pass it as "fred".
Cheers,
Evan @ digicool & 4-am
__
Evan Simpson wrote:
>
> From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cool :-) And even though I pass it in as _, it'll get bound to whatever is
> > specified on the bindings tab, right?
>
> Nope. If you called it "fred" on the bindings tab, pass it as "fred".
rats :-( How hard would it be to ma
Evan Simpson wrote:
>
> From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The Bug:
> >
> > If I use an name other than 'context' to bind to context, I quite often
> (but not
> > always :-S) get a KeyError on that name.
>
> I'll check this out. It's in the Collector, right?
It is now ;-)
http://clas
From: Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Bug:
>
> If I use an name other than 'context' to bind to context, I quite often
(but not
> always :-S) get a KeyError on that name.
I'll check this out. It's in the Collector, right?
> The Question:
>
> If I'm calling a Python Script from a Python
