On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:01:59PM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
This one is probably the most useful of the lot ;-)
From: Michel Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
Well, Jim, Evan, Brian and I pow-wowed yesterday and came up with an
interesting change. The world 'Method' is too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'Script' objects make a lot of sense, they don't overload the concept of
methods, they describe an action that people commonly want to do (script
the web) and they clear up a lot of potential confusion for newbie and
old-hat alike.
Oh, yuck! Now we
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:18:47PM -0700, Michel Pelletier wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The proposal is not for PythonScript but a "Python Script". We are not
inventing a new language, this is python, we are just coming up with the
name for an object. Don't capitalize it and you'll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip good discussion
Now we just need a generic term, which will not cause other confusions
later on down the road for the concept. I really don't like script,
especially next to a language name (in the web domain). You don't like
function (which was not my
Michel Pelletier wrote:
snip good discussion
and move on to something REALLY silly! :^
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
descriptive. Widget has technical meaning. Perhaps task or job are
suitable, as in
Safe Python Task
Safe Python Job
Safe Python Subtask
Safe Python Function
Safe
Michel Pelletier wrote:
Keep in mind also that we are moving towards a new architecture with
"Documents" and "Templates" (ala HyperDOM). I think Scripts fits right
in there:
Documents, Templates and Scripts
or
Documents, Templates and Methods
I tend to think of things as:
