Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 2.3.3 - 2.5.1b2 upgrade problem

2002-04-18 Thread Chris Withers
Shane Hathaway wrote: http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/BetterTracebacks All the work described (besides the documentation and Dieter's suggestion of adding error_tb to the default standard_error_message) is checked into the trunk. No more invalid HTML. :-) Well, it's only

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 2.3.3 - 2.5.1b2 upgrade problem

2002-04-17 Thread Shane Hathaway
Simon Michael wrote: R. David Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Probably, but I naively imagined that I was sophisticated enough to be finding a real problem...but I'm obviously not smart enough to realize that a breakage this fundamental could be due to a package like ZDebug. I wasn't

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 2.3.3 - 2.5.1b2 upgrade problem

2002-04-17 Thread Chris Withers
Shane Hathaway wrote: I've been putting in code for Zope 2.6 that replaces the functionality of ZDebug. ZDebug was always woefully unsafe. Zope 2.6 will have improved tracebacks. Does that mean we can turn them off when we don't want them and there's no more of that damn awful appending

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 2.3.3 - 2.5.1b2 upgrade problem

2002-04-17 Thread Shane Hathaway
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Chris Withers wrote: Shane Hathaway wrote: I've been putting in code for Zope 2.6 that replaces the functionality of ZDebug. ZDebug was always woefully unsafe. Zope 2.6 will have improved tracebacks. Does that mean we can turn them off when we don't want them