Evan Simpson wrote:
>
> From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Could that we added to PythonScripts/standard.py so I don't have to do it
> all
> > the time?
>
> This is just part of a general security review that needs to happen.
I thought that happened in 2.2?
> I
> suppose we need a
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Could that we added to PythonScripts/standard.py so I don't have to do it
all
> the time?
This is just part of a general security review that needs to happen. I
suppose we need a place to collect suggestions about objects that ought to
be exposed to re
Chris Withers wrote:
> Maybe this could be bundled into the RestrictedPython work?
I think it needs to be its own project... the RestrictedPython work is
being done at a much lower level than this.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://l
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> We actually need to do something to make a whole bunch of default stuff
> importable and usable from within Python Scripts, it's just a matter of
> which modules/classes to add security declarations for.
Maybe this could be bundled into the RestrictedPython work?
>
We actually need to do something to make a whole bunch of default stuff
importable and usable from within Python Scripts, it's just a matter of
which modules/classes to add security declarations for. It's also a
matter of when, and who. This needs to go through the fishbowl,
likely. Now if only
Chris McDonough wrote:
>
> Here Chris, I'll try to solve your pain (untested):
>
> from AccessControl import ModuleSecurityInfo
> ModuleSecurityInfo('Products').declarePublic('Catalog')
> ModuleSecurityInfo('Products.Catalog').declarePublic('CatalogError')
Could that we added to PythonScripts/s
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Evan Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Grrr... Python Scripts
> Evan Simpson wrote:
> >
Evan Simpson wrote:
>
> Use the same security process as providing access to anything Zope doesn't
> already expose.
Wgh! :~(
> We should expose exceptions like this by default, but we
> haven't yet. Sorry.
No worries, where should I be looking to implement this? Woudl a patch eb likely
