Hi Christian(s)!
I know most people dislike Program Files. I do too! But it's the
closest we have to a 'standard' place for installing applications.
As bad as it is, I too don't like Documents and Settings\username,
but that's the closest we have from $HOME.
As noted, you have the choice at
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi Christian(s)!
I know most people dislike Program Files. I do too! But it's the
closest we have to a 'standard' place for installing applications.
It's not the 'standard'. To name a few examples, all of Python, Lotus
Notes and, perhaps most tellingly, IIS and
On 11/10/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi Christian(s)!
I know most people dislike Program Files. I do too! But it's the
closest we have to a 'standard' place for installing applications.
It's not the 'standard'. To name a few examples, all of Python,
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Just as a note, those are pretty 'Advanced' applications. OTOH, Zope
is too. So I buy your argument.
Yay :-)
What's your proposal for default Installation and Instance directories?
I borrowed Guido's time machine an answered this already in another
message ;-)
-
Previously Chris Withers wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi Christian(s)!
I know most people dislike Program Files. I do too! But it's the
closest we have to a 'standard' place for installing applications.
It's not the 'standard'. To name a few examples, all of Python, Lotus
Notes and,
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
For their data, not for their binaries libraries.
Actually no, all of their data, binaries and libraries live in their own
top level directories...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
