Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-23 Thread Christian Theune
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 09:58:02PM +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote: Lennart Regebro wrote: On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So let's just build a first nice zope.org with subfolders explaining the different projects because it's important to have

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-08 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: Chris Withers wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: Yeah, I know this is really a me too post, but I think we should err on the side of conventional for our website. We can't go from out-of-date boring to cutting edge hip in one giant leap; it won't be believable.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-08 Thread Chris Withers
Martin Aspeli wrote: Yes. That's the point. It's vanilla Plone (well, one custom content type for the feature that fronts each section, but it's trivial) with a simple skin, not the FrankePlone that runs the old site. As a case in point, Wichert upgraded it from 3.0 to 3.1rc in about ten

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-08 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Chris Withers wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Yes. That's the point. It's vanilla Plone (well, one custom content type for the feature that fronts each section, but it's trivial) with a simple skin, not the FrankePlone that runs the old site. As a case in point, Wichert upgraded

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-07 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On Apr 7, 2008, at 00:20 , Alexander Limi wrote: - Try not to be too clever with the Taste/Get and other links. People actually scan for links that are similar from other projects, and having to interpret/understand them is confusing. +1 - The list of companies using Zope includes

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-07 Thread Chris Withers
Martijn Faassen wrote: Yeah, I know this is really a me too post, but I think we should err on the side of conventional for our website. We can't go from out-of-date boring to cutting edge hip in one giant leap; it won't be believable. Let's stick with what people know from other sites, and

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-05 Thread Paul Carduner
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Carduner wrote: I'm wondering where the Documentation section is? I'd like to volunteer for *that* section. By the way, the design looks pretty nice. There's one (called Learn) for each project, i.e. zope

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-05 Thread Paul Carduner
On Apr 5, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's no content that isn't visible to anonymous on the site. Basically, we originally thought we would have one documentation/learn section for all Zope technologies. However, it seemed to make more sense to have a

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Let's fix the damned website

2008-04-05 Thread Kent Tenney
Look at Sphinx for providing brilliant access to ReST doc. http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ doing no more than adding a .. module:: modname directive to a ReST file causes it to be converted to html, latex or pdf indexed and searchable. placing modname in the .. toctree:: directive creates the proper