On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:39:28PM +0100, Paul Everitt wrote:
> I know what the practical benefits that RDF can mean for content
> management. And it isn't esoteric Semantic Gibberish. I'm unable,
> though, to map it on the server side. However, I'm having luck on the
> client side:
>
> ht
Just a link:
> - RDF is hard to read,
http://brownsauce.sourceforge.net/
--
Jean Jordaan
http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
On Friday, Feb 21, 2003, at 04:16 Europe/Paris, Craeg K Strong wrote:
Paul Everitt wrote:
On jeudi, fév 20, 2003, at 22:15 Europe/Paris, Shane Hathaway wrote:
- RDF is hard to read, but legibility by humans isn't its primary
focus. It's more concerned with providing a way to declare any
r
Paul Everitt wrote:
On jeudi, fév 20, 2003, at 22:15 Europe/Paris, Shane Hathaway wrote:
- RDF is hard to read, but legibility by humans isn't its primary
focus. It's more concerned with providing a way to declare any
relationship about anything.
Right. That's what the graph tool at the W
