I agree with Chris: *wow*!
[re the original explanation]
...
I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear
parts.
Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to
convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record sequences escaped me
a bit. This
Gary Poster wrote:
I agree with Chris: *wow*!
[re the original explanation]
...
I'm sure I left a few things out, so ask questions about the unclear
parts.
Everything was wonderfully clear, except that the actual mechanism to
convert the nested tuples flexibly to RDBMS record
