Re: [Zope-dev] Re: death to index_html; ObjectManager?

2002-04-17 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Tuesday 16 Apr 2002 10:25 pm, Casey Duncan wrote: However, you should know that the crux of this change is really to the publisher, the mixin is just the management piece. Hmmm. Thanks for raising this. I wasnt aware that these browser_default changes went so deep. Im curious as to *why*

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: death to index_html; ObjectManager?

2002-04-16 Thread Jeffrey P Shell
On 4/16/02 8:53 AM, Casey Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The implementation adds the API to manage browser default for all objectmanagers. However, no browser_default handler is actually added to the object unless you specify a default other than index_html What was the specific

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: death to index_html; ObjectManager?

2002-04-16 Thread Casey Duncan
Well I honestly hadn't considered that. So, I suppose changing to to a mix-in inherited by folder is better. However, you should know that the crux of this change is really to the publisher, the mixin is just the management piece. *any* object can define a browser_default hook that overrides

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: death to index_html; ObjectManager?

2002-04-16 Thread R. David Murray
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Casey Duncan wrote: However, you should know that the crux of this change is really to the publisher, the mixin is just the management piece. *any* object can define a browser_default hook that overrides 'index_html', not just objectmanagers. All the more reason to make