On Thursday 12 March 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Stephan, what would be involved to bringing this buildout to
> something.zope.org? Would that even be a good idea? The French Python
> association runs this now, right?
We should ask ccomb (Chsristopher), though I think other people chipping in
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> Okay, it's released now. Expect some test breakage for the first time,
>> until we adapt our packages to the removal of bbb interfaces. I'll try
>> to do that quickly and then run the KGS and compat tests.
>
> With all th
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Okay, it's released now. Expect some test breakage for the first time,
> until we adapt our packages to the removal of bbb interfaces. I'll try
> to do that quickly and then run the KGS and compat tests.
With all these refactorings going on, we re
2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> 2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Dan Korostelev wrote:
I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
response on my requests for a release.
>>> I see that you have access to that package now. Could you
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> 2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
>> Hey,
>>
>> Dan Korostelev wrote:
>>> I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
>>> response on my requests for a release.
>> I see that you have access to that package now. Could you also give
>> srichter access to zope.
2009/3/12 Martijn Faassen :
> Hey,
>
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
>> response on my requests for a release.
>
> I see that you have access to that package now. Could you also give
> srichter access to zope.component?
Okay, done. Shoul
Hey,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
> I decided to start a new branch of that, because there's no still
> response on my requests for a release.
I see that you have access to that package now. Could you also give
srichter access to zope.component?
Regards,
Martijn
_
