I assume you are right but I have not tried it yet. Andreas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alastair Burt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andreas Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "R. David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 08:14 Subject: [Zope-dev] STX and nested colorising (was underline symbology)
> "Andreas Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Feel free to provide a patch and unittests *wink* > > I was about to send a patch, but as I was putting it through its paces, I > realised that, depending on the ordering of the list > 'DocumentClass.text_types', I could either underline emphasised text > (*_foo_*) or emphasise underlined text (_*foo*_) but not both. My brief > examination of the code leads me to think this must be the case for all > nested colorisation: you can nest a colorisation within one that occurs > earlier in text_types but in one that occurs later. Am I correct? > > --- Alastair > > > _______________________________________________ > Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) > _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
