Hi,
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 04:18 +0300, Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/5 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I think we can only make the correct determination if we get an idea of
the performance implications. If it turns out the C code
2009/3/5 Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com:
Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I think we can only make the correct determination if we get an idea of
the performance implications. If it turns out the C code brings
significant speedups in real-world applications, we should
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I think we can only make the correct determination if we get an idea of
the performance implications. If it turns out the C code brings
significant speedups in real-world applications, we should create a
zope.hookable with a Python + C implementation.
Even if it
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
It probably could be (in fact, I prototyped it there first). However,
it turns out that zope.hookable has effectively *no* clients beyond
zope.component, which meant that I could lose the 'install_requires'
dependency altogether by moving the pure-Python bits to
