Marius Gedminas wrote:
So either let's make zope.app.testing not depend on the whole world,
+1
or
let's extract the core of zope.app.testing
+10
and put it somewhere else
(zope.testing?).
-1
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Malthe Borch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't know there was a controversy, but I do remember that there was
consensus that ``extras_require`` is not the most elegant solution.
Oh, there is!
Fred Drake wrote:
This is a controversial change; can we avoid making changes like this
until a policy is agreed upon?
The controversy surrounding this has been discussed on zope-dev
several times; I don't want to rehash it *right now*, since we all
have things we need to get done.
I
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Malthe Borch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't know there was a controversy, but I do remember that there was
consensus that ``extras_require`` is not the most elegant solution.
Oh, there is!
If you can advise a different way to avoid pulling in
Fred Drake wrote:
There's no good way to avoid dependencies like zope.app.testing;
because that's part of the test environment, the tests won't show
whether there are problems when it's removed. If you want to fly what
you test, test dependencies can't be eliminated.
I understand, but this
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:59:24PM +0200, Malthe Borch wrote:
Fred Drake wrote:
There's no good way to avoid dependencies like zope.app.testing;
because that's part of the test environment, the tests won't show
whether there are problems when it's removed. If you want to fly what
you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Malthe Borch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't know there was a controversy, but I do remember that there was
consensus that ``extras_require`` is not the most elegant solution.
Oh, there is!
