Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.publisher/trunk/ Moved dependency on zope.testing from install_requires to tests_require.

2009-08-25 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jim Fulton wrote: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Martijn Faassenfaas...@startifact.com wrote: [snip] Ah, that's cool. I take it it's not yet possible to do without the test extra entirely and let buildout rely on the test_require section? That way we could do without duplication. That's

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.publisher/trunk/ Moved dependency on zope.testing from install_requires to tests_require.

2009-08-11 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, Jim Fulton wrote: [snip] Id like us to say something along the lines of: If your tests have additional dependencies, define test extra with these dependencies. Also define tests_require and test_suite so that your package supports the test command. (Not verbatim and we should give

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.publisher/trunk/ Moved dependency on zope.testing from install_requires to tests_require.

2009-08-11 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Martijn Faassenfaas...@startifact.com wrote: Hey, Jim Fulton wrote: [snip] Id like us to say something along the lines of: If your tests have additional dependencies, define test extra with these dependencies.  Also define tests_require and test_suite so

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.publisher/trunk/ Moved dependency on zope.testing from install_requires to tests_require.

2009-08-08 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hey, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: [snip] In zope.component we use tests_require, in the very same way, for example. Shall I remove it there, too? Is there a policy/document which explains how we use extras and tests_require? Probably not. I think it'd be very good to add something like this to

Re: [Zope-dev] SVN: zope.publisher/trunk/ Moved dependency on zope.testing from install_requires to tests_require.

2009-08-08 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Martijn Faassenfaas...@startifact.com wrote: Hey, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: [snip] In zope.component we use tests_require, in the very same way, for example. Shall I remove it there, too? Is there a policy/document which explains how we use extras and