On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:54:12 -0600, Jeffrey P Shell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/17/02 9:56 AM, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If folks still want OrderedFolder (or, at least ordering capability) in the
core I'm still willing to help with that.
For add-to-the-core functionality, I'll
Anthony Baxter wrote:
deliberately-trolling-for-ChrisW-ly yrs,
:-P
Chris - stay in the stone age, I hear they have fire there ;-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or
Chris - stay in the stone age, I hear they have fire there ;-)
mmm. fre pretty.
Page Templates burn, don't dey. Be a shame if somefing was to happen
to your nice shiny website.
Anthony, who might have been spending too long in the bad places of SQL.
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Anthony, who might have been spending too long in the bad places of SQL.
Maybe getting hooked back on the PHP too? I saw ya, that dodgy bloke in the
street, money changing hands...
*grinz*
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
At 17.04.2002 10:57 -0400, Brian Lloyd wrote:
From the Zen of Python: Explicit is better than implicit.
We've been trying hard to adopt this bit of Zen. If you write
REQUEST.set, you can look at it and easily see what is happening.
Same with SESSION.set.
If you're looking at dtml-set... as a
--On Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:48:12 AM -0400 Brian Lloyd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've already learned the hard way that the existing SiteRoots
and VirtualHostMonsters etc. confuse people. This is partly due
to under-documentation, but it is also partly because of the
here, we'll
Lennart Regebro wrote:
Yup. Therefore I think that the host monster shouldn't be included. VHF
should supercede it.
If backwards compatibility is desired, add warning messages for usage and
remove the VHM from the add box, but continue to include it in the code. :-)
Just as a passing
On 4/17/02 9:56 AM, Gary Poster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 11:48 am, Brian Lloyd wrote:
Ok :) As far as vetting virtual host folder, my concerns
boil down to:
a. dependency / requirement for ordered folder
b. having yet another virtual host thing in the
Brian Lloyd wrote
We've been trying hard to adopt this bit of Zen. If you write
REQUEST.set, you can look at it and easily see what is happening.
Same with SESSION.set.
The other reason why I made SESSION all shouty-caps in SQLSession[*]
is to make it _very_ obvious when it's being used.
Toby Dickenson wrote
Do you remember what we had to type to achieve the equivalent of
dtml-let, before dtml-let was introduced? That *was* horrible.
gee, I dunno...
dtml-with _.namespace(name='foo') /dtml-with
has a sort of charm to it.
sheesh, it's still not as ugly as ZPT.
Lennart Regebro wrote:
There is an alternative, and that is to clean up the enhanced
enhanced virtual host monster we at Torped have done. It's based on
sfm@imemes enhanced VHM and just like VHF is makes it possible to
have standalone virtual hosting without strange apache magic. We
...I sent out a note a while ago now trying to scare up
some ideas on how to vet the current list of 2.6 proposals
and get to a final plan. I didn't get much (any?) response :(
I am, as the author of the dtml-set tag, of course willing to
commit to the
implementation of this tag
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 03:44 pm, Brian Lloyd wrote:
...I sent out a note a while ago now trying to scare up
some ideas on how to vet the current list of 2.6 proposals
and get to a final plan. I didn't get much (any?) response :(
By the way, Brian, if I can with the remaining amount of
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:47:49 -0400
Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I sent out a note a while ago now trying to scare up
some ideas on how to vet the current list of 2.6 proposals
and get to a final plan. I didn't get much (any?) response :(
Hello Brian,
just to give some feedback
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:47:49PM -0400, Brian Lloyd wrote:
...I sent out a note a while ago now trying to scare up
some ideas on how to vet the current list of 2.6 proposals
and get to a final plan. I didn't get much (any?) response :(
I am, as the author of the dtml-set tag, of course
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:16:35 -0400, Jim Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2. If we want to get fancy about allowing authentication using that ip
address like naked ZServers can do,
to
if request.has_key('HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR'):
addr=request['HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR']
elif
The idea is to allow user to specify several points of presence (pop)
for an object. Does this break security? Probably yes, but in what case?
If an object from higly secure envionment appeared somewhere in
Anonymous zone, what then? Yes, Anonymous is able to alter object. But
there was
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 01:30:56 +0300, Myroslav Opyr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Anonymous able to get out of the shared
object to secure environment?
User X is designated as a manager of folder /Xfolder. In todays Zope
/Xfolder is a secure environment He has no authority over objects
outside
At 01:30 10-04-2002 +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Ok. Let's find out what we have and what we want. First of all we have
strict hierarchy in ZODB where each object appears only once in the
tree. Thus to access to an object it is only one way from root down to
an object through containers.
The
At 10:06 10-04-2002 -0400, Brian Lloyd wrote:
What is wrong with leaving this as an add-on product? Why does
it _need_ to be a part of the core at all? Useful products are
useful, whether or not they come with Zope, and there are
plenty of very useful products that don't come built in.
I
At 15:12 10-04-2002 +0100, Toby Dickenson wrote:
User X is designated as a manager of folder /Xfolder. In todays Zope
/Xfolder is a secure environment He has no authority over objects
outside that folder, thanks to aq_inContextOf
Can he create links to objects outside that folder?
No, he
Support for X-HTTPD-FORWARDED-FOR
Code for this is pretty simple:
modify 2 files, ZServer/medusa/http_server.py and
lib/python/AccessControl/User.py
1. To put the proxy-passed ip address in the zserver log,
Around line 269 in ZServer/medusa/http_server.py, add a method
Jim Washington wrote:
2. If we want to get fancy about allowing authentication using that ip
address like naked ZServers can do,
In lib/python/AccessControl/User.py, around line 1116,
change
if request.has_key('REMOTE_ADDR'):
addr=request['REMOTE_ADDR']
to
if
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:59:38PM +0200, Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
Jim Washington wrote:
2. If we want to get fancy about allowing authentication using that ip
address like naked ZServers can do,
In lib/python/AccessControl/User.py, around line 1116,
change
if
Brian Lloyd wrote:
Both me and Myroslav Opyr [EMAIL PROTECTED] are quite
commited to do the proposed Object Links/References. Although
from the emails we exchanged with you, I would've guessed that
it was one of the controversial enough to be a Vetted item :-)
Anyways I'm commited to do
25 matches
Mail list logo