Re: [Zope-dev] Top-level namespace package for Zope 2 ?

2009-12-30 Thread Martin Aspeli
Baiju M wrote: >> The packages that we might want to break out (like we did with >> Acquistion, ExtensionClass, DateTime) should retain their name, so >> nobody has to change any code to work with them. > > I think we could have added those packages in a namespace. Why? A million things depend on

Re: [Zope-dev] Top-level namespace package for Zope 2 ?

2009-12-30 Thread Baiju M
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Baiju M wrote: >>    I was going through Zope 2 source code today. There are 20+ top-level >> packages specific to Zope 2.  Would it be useful if we move those packages >> to a top-level namespace package

Re: [Zope-dev] Top-level namespace package for Zope 2 ?

2009-12-29 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Baiju M wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Baiju M wrote: >> Hi, >>I was going through Zope 2 source code today. There are 20+ top-level >> packages specific to Zope 2. Would it be useful if we move those packages >> to a top-level namespa

Re: [Zope-dev] Top-level namespace package for Zope 2 ?

2009-12-29 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Baiju M wrote: >    I was going through Zope 2 source code today. There are 20+ top-level > packages specific to Zope 2.  Would it be useful if we move those packages > to a top-level namespace package.  I mean something similar to: > "zope.app.*", "grokcore.*", "r

Re: [Zope-dev] Top-level namespace package for Zope 2 ?

2009-12-29 Thread Baiju M
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Baiju M wrote: > Hi, >    I was going through Zope 2 source code today. There are 20+ top-level > packages specific to Zope 2.  Would it be useful if we move those packages > to a top-level namespace package.  I mean something similar to: > "zope.app.*", "grokcore.