I'll quote the (seemingly late) Andrew Kenneth Milton wrt Zope 2: http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/Silly/newzopelogo
;-) On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 20:35, Adrian van den Dries wrote: > On June 20, Jamie Heilman wrote: > > and I don't like surprises > > Zope 2 is probably not the most suitable choice, then. ;-) > > More seriously, though, my colleagues and I will often find a few of > these sorts of *surprising* things in Zope 2 every week. It's really > quite demoralising building for Zope 2 when it feels like such a dead > effort, with many (seemingly rather deep) problems in Zope 2 that > nobody has either the time or motivation to fix, because all the > interesting work is happening on Zope 3. > > Are there, or will there be, any guidelines for developing for Zope 2 > with the view to migrating to Zope 3? > > And given the logevity of Zope 2 suggested by the roadmap, will there > be any effort to clean up the Zope 2 code in the medium/long term? > > FWIW I use Zope for its webblication features over its CMF features, > which is why Zope 3 is far more interesting than most of the work > happening around Zope 2. > > I understand that things are moving quite well with Zope 3 but the > current state of affairs does put places like ours, with a commitment > to producing a large, complicated Zope 2 extranet/portal in a number > of months, in a confusing headspace. > > a. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )