On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:26:14PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
*cheers*
I'll take that as STFU ;-)
It wasn't intended that
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 11:52 PM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
This project does not seem to be public.
Right - thanks Martijn for spilling the beans
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
release a name other than Zope.
Well, we had to do the classic Zope 3 release at least one more
I would say so also. Since z2, z3 both be released in future as eggs, I
I expect the only difference to be in kgs that ensures a working set of
packages (whether it is zope3, zope2, or for that matter any other project).
Any sort of release in the future should only reflect a state of a
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a
name
other than
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard that rumored, but there's nothing indicating that in the release
announcement. There are forward looking statements in there: tarballs...
for
the last 3.4 series and probably for 3.5 as well. I take this
Hey,.
On Feb 1, 2008 4:09 PM, David Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
It might be nice for the marketing of zope to give each set of eggs a
nice name. Just using familiar mozilla names as an illustration, see how
nice zope-thunderbird or zope-firefox look. So do away with the kgs in
the
On Friday 01 February 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
- I think the goal of these releases is less to provide an application
than to provide a possibly useful collection of some libraries. This
is similar to the Python standard library. Some people see
significant value in this. I believe
On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
Tom Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the
appserver It
would reduce confusion to
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a name
other than Zope.
Eg.
Current name Proposed name
Not responding to anyone in particular:
I see there are plenty people with opinions. I would love not to do the Zope 3
releases anymore! I am tired of the endless discussions.
Think I am frustrated? Absolutely!
All the suggestions made here require more work, more manpower. But there is
Hi Martijn. I am familiar with grok and the fun and welcoming community
you have created. With the perspective I have suggested, releases are
only sets with different names giving meaning to each set for developer
groups.
As a project, grok is currently pinning eggs but can also provide a kgs
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Chris McDonough wrote:
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver
It would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver
release a name other than Zope.
Well, we had to do the classic Zope 3
Tom Hoffman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take a risk by stating the obvious.
If there will continue to be a release schedule for Zope 3, the appserver It
would reduce confusion to new users greatly to give the appserver release a
name
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:11 PM, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
This project does not seem to be public.
I don't know how it's been setup, but if you want to join I'm sure
Martin Aspeli can
On Friday 01 February 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://www.openplans.org/projects/zorg-redux
This project does not seem to be public.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. Zope Stephan Richter
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Not responding to anyone in particular:
I see there are plenty people with opinions. I would love not to do the Zope 3
releases anymore! I am tired of the endless discussions.
Think I am frustrated? Absolutely!
All the suggestions made here require more work, more
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:04 PM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The transition seems now achieved and the most important thing is to have a
dedicated web site with clear information, so that there are new users, and
new
contributors. When someone goes to the zope.org
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
*cheers*
Marius Gedminas
--
The clothes have no emperor.
-- C.A.R. Hoare, commenting on ADA.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Feb 2, 2008 12:09 AM, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 6:04 PM, Christophe Combelles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
The transition seems now achieved and the most important thing is to have a
dedicated web site with clear information, so that there are new
Hey,
On Feb 1, 2008 8:59 PM, Paul Carduner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I think the website is one of the huge impediments to joining the Zope
community. When you compare zope.org to all the other web framework
websites like django, turbogears, and RoR, it is pretty clear why
people
I'll take that as STFU ;-)
Got it.
- C
Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:06:48AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
I typed four more paragraphs full of markety stuff here but deleted them.
*cheers*
Marius Gedminas
22 matches
Mail list logo
