On 31 March 2011 10:15, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote:
> 2011/3/23 Laurence Rowe :
>> On 23 March 2011 14:43, Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> Multiple 'Content-Length' headers is definitely a Bad Thing. I filed a
>>> bug, which Mark Ramm has promised to escalate:
>>>
>>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/s
2011/3/23 Laurence Rowe :
> On 23 March 2011 14:43, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Multiple 'Content-Length' headers is definitely a Bad Thing. I filed a
>> bug, which Mark Ramm has promised to escalate:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/ticket/18486
>>
>> I have a patch for setuptools
2011/3/25 Gediminas Paulauskas :
>> Buildout tries to download ClientForm from sourceforge.net and seems to get
>> a broken content-length header.
>> I see the same problem when using distutils 0.6.14 since the last 3 or 4
>> days.
>> But when I use wget the header seems to be correct or wget is
2011/3/23 Michael Howitz :
> Am 23.03.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Zope Tests Summarizer:
>> Test failures
>> -
> [...]
>> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
>> From: buildbot at pov.lt
>> Date: Tue Mar 22 22:26:52 EDT 2011
>> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2011 10:49 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> On 23 March 2011 14:43, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Multiple 'Content-Length' headers is definitely a Bad Thing. I filed a
>> bug, which Mark Ramm has promised to escalate:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/
On 23 March 2011 14:43, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Multiple 'Content-Length' headers is definitely a Bad Thing. I filed a
> bug, which Mark Ramm has promised to escalate:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/ticket/18486
>
> I have a patch for setuptools which works around it:
>
> http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2011 10:18 AM, Benji York wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
>> Am 23.03.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Zope Tests Summarizer:
>>> Test failures
>>> -
>> [...]
>>> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / p
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 23.03.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Zope Tests Summarizer:
>> Test failures
>> -
> [...]
>> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
>> From: buildbot at pov.lt
>> Date: Tue Mar 22 22:26:52 EDT 2011
>> URL: http:
Am 23.03.2011 um 12:57 schrieb Zope Tests Summarizer:
> Test failures
> -
[...]
> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
> From: buildbot at pov.lt
> Date: Tue Mar 22 22:26:52 EDT 2011
> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/035953.html
While: