On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jun 28 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 45 messages: 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
The fact that the test failed seems to make it less than sufficient. I
don't quite see how checking pystones is a useful measure, unless you
*know* that there is only CPU involved and that the machine where you
are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benji York wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
The fact that the test failed seems to make it less than sufficient. I
don't quite see how checking pystones is a useful measure, unless you
*know* that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jun 27 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Jun 28 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 45 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from
ct at gocept.com, 27 from