On Dec 3, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>
>>> Gary Poster wrote: [snip]
I personally think these efforts do not make the potential
consensus on ``adapt`` and ``utility`` methods any less
inter
Gary Poster wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>
>> Gary Poster wrote: [snip]
>>> I personally think these efforts do not make the potential
>>> consensus on ``adapt`` and ``utility`` methods any less
>>> interesting: they would be a concrete win for my users.
>> I agree
On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
> [snip]
>> I personally think these efforts do not make the potential consensus
>> on ``adapt`` and ``utility`` methods any less interesting: they would
>> be a concrete win for my users.
>
> I agree with much of what Gary
