Hey,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
Any chance on beating on this? Or somewhere else to have a buildbot
slave on win32?
Just touched zc.buildout trunk and it seems to fail miserably on
win32.
Hey, I'd be very happy is someone took the initiative of
Hey Martijn,
Any chance on beating on this? Or somewhere else to have a buildbot
slave on win32?
Just touched zc.buildout trunk and it seems to fail miserably on
win32.
Saturday, January 31, 2009, 11:55:47 AM, you wrote:
MF Hi there,
MF Recently there was a project called snakebite revealed:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 11:22:59PM +0100, Christophe Combelles wrote:
As Sebastien said, we have (at least) one new machine that can possibly be
dedicated to set-up a buildbot, in case we can't rely on snakebite. We'll
probably need help also from Marius who already did this for 3.4 (
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Would people be interested in working on making use of this platform? We
could use it for testing of a wide range of packages. Perhaps the ZODB
would be an interesting package to start with. If so we should approach
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:55, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
I think the Zope project counts as a prominent Python project and we
have a lot of interesting code to test, so perhaps they'll let us in. :)
Would people be interested in working on making use of this platform? We
Sebastien Douche a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:55, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
I think the Zope project counts as a prominent Python project and we
have a lot of interesting code to test, so perhaps they'll let us in. :)
Would people be interested in working on making
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Would people be interested in working on making use of this platform? We
could use it for testing of a wide range of packages. Perhaps the ZODB
would be an interesting package to start with. If so we should approach
snakebite to see whether