On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Thomas Lotze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>
> [zc.blist]
>> To release it responsibly now, someone needs to claim maintainership.
>
> As I was the one asking in the first place, I'm willing to do this unless
> there's a policy for zc.* packages to
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:54 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>
> [zc.blist]
>> To release it responsibly now, someone needs to claim maintainership.
>
> As I was the one asking in the first place, I'm willing to do this
Great! Thank you!
> unless
> there's a policy for zc.* packages t
Gary Poster wrote:
[zc.blist]
> To release it responsibly now, someone needs to claim maintainership.
As I was the one asking in the first place, I'm willing to do this unless
there's a policy for zc.* packages to be maintained by ZC people or
something similar.
--
Thomas
___
On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Benji York wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Lotze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> lotze.de> wrote:
>> The documentation of OrderedDict from zc.dict 1.2.1 states that the
>> current implementation is inefficient for large collections because
>> it
>> uses a Per
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Lotze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The documentation of OrderedDict from zc.dict 1.2.1 states that the
> current implementation is inefficient for large collections because it
> uses a PersistentList to store the order. It also says that a BList which
> would
