Jo Meder wrote:
A long time ago, Shane posted a very useful function
to analyse acquisition wrappers: "showaq".
Maybe, the mailing list archive is still able to locate his post...
Just ask Google: http://www.zope.org/Members/chrisw/showaq
Thanks Jo. It seems though that there was a branch
Am 09.06.2005, 19:28 Uhr
schrieb Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A long time ago, Shane posted a very useful function
> to analyse acquisition wrappers: "showaq".
>
> Maybe, the mailing list archive is still able to locate his post...
Just ask Google: http://www.zope.org/Members/chr
John Barratt wrote at 2005-6-9 16:54 +1000:
> ...
>I would hence suspect the wrapping, and/or behaviour of the object
>and/or context to be somehow different?
A long time ago, Shane posted a very useful function
to analyse acquisition wrappers: "showaq".
Maybe, the mailing list archive is still
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Looks like an acquisition bug:
obj.aq_inContextOf(context, 1) is recursively defined by:
True, if "obj.aq_base == context.aq_base"
or "container(obj) is not None"
and "container(obj).aq_inContextOf(context, 1)"
where "container
John Barratt wrote at 2005-6-7 10:08 +1000:
> ...
> From a bit of digging through the code it seems there is a difference
>comes about in the call on line 166 of AccessControl.User inside
>_check_context :
>
> return object.aq_inContextOf(context, 1)
>
>In Zope 2.8 it returns 0, in 2.76 it re
