On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 15:41, Matthew T. Kromer wrote:
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
We aren't getting any core files, even after setting ulimit correctly
(although we could be setting it uncorrectly. I'll look into that
further). Anyway, someone else in this list said that core dumps for
Andy Dustman wrote:
If you don't think a core dump is going to be useful, gdb isn't going to
be either.
Well, the problem is on Linux, the core file is from the process that
received the SIG11, not the one that caused it, in most cases (due to
the way Linux implements threads). To the best
Well, one of the things I was going to ask next was for some help doing
postmortem.
We aren't getting any core files, even after setting ulimit correctly
(although we could be setting it uncorrectly. I'll look into that
further). Anyway, someone else in this list said that core dumps for
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Well, one of the things I was going to ask next was for some help doing
postmortem.
We aren't getting any core files, even after setting ulimit correctly
(although we could be setting it uncorrectly. I'll look into that
further). Anyway, someone else in this list
Matthew T. Kromer writes:
...
Well largely, ALL I want is the backtrace -- and I'm wondering if I
could cobble something together that could get it. The problem is it
needs to look at the symbol table, and I dont know how to get at that
via C -- ie, gdb doesnt have an interface that
