We are having an interesting discussion internally here, which I would
like to bring up on the list.
- In the event of a plugin that provides information about a
particular user/group failing to do so (because it's misconfigured or
otherwise), should PAS complain loudly about it?
I know that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 Feb 2007, at 19:45, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Now, some might argue that this is an application-specific policy. The
fact is that there's no obvious way currently of 'vetoing' a login
based on the lack of certain user properties (like the email
