Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Mark Pratt
On Feb 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Mark Pratt wrote: [snip] If the idea is to deliver the message that Zope 3 is great, clutting the message with Zope 2 cruft (not the same as if we have some really great zope 2 documentation, but what's there has rotted quite a bit)

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Chris Withers
Tonico Strasser wrote: IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity, is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and the whole TTW content management system. I think it's much easier to add and update content with SVN. (This would also

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Max M
Chris Withers wrote: Tonico Strasser wrote: IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity, is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and the whole TTW content management system. I think it's much easier to add and update content with SVN.

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 2/9/06, Martijn Faassen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still hopeful we can at least swap out zope.org's frontpage and initial pages with something better that describes both Zope 2, Zope 3, and its relationship. Quite a bit of text is already written that attempts that which is in codespeak

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 2/9/06, Andrew Sawyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:28 +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: But other than that, I think we should focus on having a zope3.org. A zope.org and zope3.org? Yup. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Martin Aspeli
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 13:00:43 -, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tonico Strasser wrote: IMHO, the most important change for reducing visual design complexity, is to get rid of the /Members section, including log in/log out, and the whole TTW content management system. I think

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread Martin Aspeli
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:28:22 -, Andrew Sawyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:09 +0100, Max M wrote: Chris Withers wrote: If we cannot make it work in Zope 2 or 3, maybe we should use rails ;-) I know Max is kidding; but to comment to Chris. One of the main

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-09 Thread bakhtiar a hamid
On Thursday 09 February 2006 18:17, Martijn Faassen wrote: Yes. Let's make a procedure for that: * find the document you think would be good to have * propose it on this list http://www.jrandolph.com/blog/?p=23#comment-324 has a good comment with good links.

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-08 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi Martijn, * are we going to target Zope 3 only with this site, or Zope 2 as well? I wrote text to cover both, as Zope 2 is currently the breadwinner of most of us. I think we can get enthusiasm more easily for Zope 3 however; nobody is going to write Zope 2 tutorials. What do we do? I

Re: [ZWeb] zope web status report 2006-02-06

2006-02-07 Thread Tonico Strasser
Martijn Faassen wrote: * does anyone know a good web designer who can design a solid looking, serious, but still exciting website for zope? Whether a site is exciting or not is purely subjective I think. I find w3.org very exciting, but I guess many here don't ;) Making a solid design