--On 5. Dezember 2005 09:52:38 -0500 Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 04 December 2005 14:35, Jim Fulton wrote:
Stephan, what needs to be done to get a beta out?
Okay, I'll cut it. It might take me till Wednesday, though.
Will do the same for Zope 2.9 on
Rocky Burt wrote:
Anyone know if there is any plan to add a toplevel products folder in
the zope svn repo like there currently is in zope's cvs repo? I know
this has held up a few products from going from zope CVS to SVN.
I don't think a separate Products folder is is necessary. Just make
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:13:31AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, your implementation also doesn't work because it doesn't
set the content length.
Speaking of which, I'd love to see a way to make this work for
situations where you can't precompute a correct content length because
e.g. you're
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:24:54PM -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
| On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 11:13:31AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| BTW, your implementation also doesn't work because it doesn't
| set the content length.
|
| Speaking of which, I'd love to see a way to make this work for
| situations
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:31:03PM -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
There are a couple conditions that must be met for 'chunked' to work
with Zope 2.
Cool. Does Z3 behave the same way?
1. A Content-Length header must not be set.
2. The request must be HTTP 1.1
3. You must be streaming
4. No
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:58:21PM -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
| On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:31:03PM -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| There are a couple conditions that must be met for 'chunked' to work
| with Zope 2.
|
| Cool. Does Z3 behave the same way?
Dunno.
| 1. A Content-Length header
Jim Fulton wrote:
There are a number of reasons we needed IResult:
- We want to be able to adapt existing output, especially
string output and we needed an interface to adapt to.
I see. I presume this is for the reason you state below, namely to be able to
customize
the setting of the
