On 10.10.2007, at 16:27, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Has anyone eggified psycopgda? I can't find mention of an egg for it
anywere. I would be pretty surprised that no-one did this so far.
we're adding http://initd.org/pub/software/psycopg/
psycopg2-2.0.6.tar.gz to our [find-links] section in
Hey,
I constantly run into the fact that the default namechooser in Zope 3
is too dumb.
Does anybody object in making it a little more smart? That is:
* replace all non us-ascii and otherwise harmful chars by something
useful (base-form or alike)
* replace spaces by - or _
--
Christian
On 10/11/07, Christian Zagrodnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I constantly run into the fact that the default namechooser in Zope 3
is too dumb.
Does anybody object in making it a little more smart? That is:
* replace all non us-ascii and otherwise harmful chars by something
useful
I think we have agreement (or an absense of anyone who is willing to
publicly admit to disagree) to retire this list and move over to zope-
dev. Let's do so. I'll wait a little while before trying to
actively prevent posts here. I suggest we let any existing threads
run out and start
Jim Fulton wrote:
I think we have agreement (or an absense of anyone who is willing to
publicly admit to disagree) to retire this list and move over to
zope-dev. Let's do so. I'll wait a little while before trying to
actively prevent posts here. I suggest we let any existing threads
run
Hi,
(sorry for not responding earlier, I've been on vacation last week and
it took me a while to advance through my mail to this thread.)
Am Samstag, den 06.10.2007, 11:17 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Recent discussions make it obvious to me that we need to come to
terms with Zope 3 releases.
Stephan Richter a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I am happy to announce that the second Foliage sprint task is completed.
Julian Bonilla, Graham Stratton and I worked on the outstanding issues on
creating a functional version of the APIDOC, which comes with Zope.
Thanks to Jens Vagelpohl, the static
On Thursday 11 October 2007 11:30, Christophe Combelles wrote:
Is there a way to know the version number it applies to?
It was generated from the trunk a few weeks back. The entire APIDOC code needs
to be reviewed in light of eggs.
Is there any l10n support or is it planned?
No, especially
