-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2007, 16:15 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
>>> I eventually came to the conclusion that our original conclusion was
>>> sound, but that we should only introduce backward incompatibilities
>>> when the ne
Am Mittwoch, den 22.08.2007, 16:15 -0400 schrieb Tres Seaver:
> > I eventually came to the conclusion that our original conclusion was
> > sound, but that we should only introduce backward incompatibilities
> > when the need is very dire, as it will cause lots of pain.
+1 from me as well.
> +
On Aug 22, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
A while ago, we had a discussion about backward compatibility and
decided that only major releases should be backward compatible. So,
for example, a 1.2 release should be backward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> A while ago, we had a discussion about backward compatibility and
> decided that only major releases should be backward compatible. So,
> for example, a 1.2 release should be backward compatible with a 1.1
> release, but a 2
