On Friday 11 November 2005 12:15, Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 40048:
use a specific revision of the Zope 3 trunk for now until we have some
sort of tag available (e.g. a Zope 3.2 beta tag).
We should have cut a Zope3-3.2 beta tag on the
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 21:12, Mikhail Kashkin wrote:
I'm also want to offer me as fresh meat in this effort.
My proposition for site plan, index pages *mark*::
Hi Mikhail,
the outline is nice, but contains items that we do not have already; for
example it has a huge documentation section
On Thursday 20 October 2005 11:19, Bernd Dorn wrote:
in my testcase http://svn.zope.org/cxoracleda/trunk/tests/
test_adapter.py?rev=39515view=auto
You need to bug Jim, so that this directory is part of the Zope3-Checkins
mailing list. ;-)
i need to somehow get the connection information
On Sunday 23 October 2005 03:12, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
So, is there or would this qualify as a bug? There is a test that
seems to point to some use with regard to namespaces, but I don't see
how this wouldn't work just as well with AttributeError.
I definitely think this is a bug. I guess
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:27, Grégoire Weber wrote:
2005/10/24, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
class IFoo(zope.interface.Interface):
attr = zope.interface.Attribute('doc string')
ITaggedValues(attr).someVariable = value
Any comments before I spend time writing this up?
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 05:10, Simon Hang wrote:
Dear all,
I'm happen to find out call Storage only do cleanup when new Entry comes
and do nothing when entries get from storage. So entries will be next
expired if there are only read activities.
I agree with your analysis and solution. If
On Monday 07 November 2005 10:18, Brian Sutherland wrote:
Please don't check this in yet, I want to review the problem before you
do, because I think specific interfaces are just nuts unless we have a
very good reason.
Sure;)
The guts of the issue are how to know what type of SQL the
On Friday 04 November 2005 11:50, Adam Groszer wrote:
I think I have something for tomorrow's bug day. It is not working
again. I have the current trunk and brand new instance.
Could you add it to the issue collector please?
Thanks!
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry
On Friday 04 November 2005 14:07, Adam Groszer wrote:
I think (that may be stupid, because I'm not an expert) that the
module is not 100% consistent, once it is checking on the passed
folder's SiteManager (in ensureUtility) and then tries to add the
utility to a maybe completely different SM
On Sunday 06 November 2005 03:23, baiju m wrote:
I am developing small Zope3 app using Zope 3.1,
today when I installed Zope svn trunk, I got two conflict errors.
I used a 'title' which is same as that used in zwiki (addMenuItem
directive). and 'name' in addform directive.
The problem
On Friday 11 November 2005 12:00, jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
I could now manage to have a relatively simple test (see attached file).
No file attached in my E-mail. :-(
I also found and fixed some other problems I encountered with the
utility registration.
Can you please have a look at the
On Saturday 12 November 2005 07:12, jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Ups, sorry here is the attachment.
Very nice work! Check it in!
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 21:12, Mikhail Kashkin wrote:
I'm also want to offer me as fresh meat in this effort.
My proposition for site plan, index pages *mark*::
Having said this, I really wish someone would take ownership in developing our
zope3.org site.
Forwarding ...
related to the current [ zope3 website report? ] thread
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I find that most pages about Zope3 end sometime mid 2004. A lot has
happened in the meantime, and I'd like to see updated material on the
site.
Since I'm rather new to Zope3, I feel not
We have a *simple* facility for managing references between objects
extrinsically. See:
http://svn.zope.org/Sandbox/zc/extrinsicreference/extrinsicreference.txt?view=markup
If there is sufficient interest, we plan to move this (tiny) project
to the zope repository.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 12:15, Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 40048:
use a specific revision of the Zope 3 trunk for now until we have some
sort of tag available (e.g. a Zope 3.2 beta tag).
We should have cut a
Helmut Merz wrote:
Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 18:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
I was thinking more about the policy of assigning unique ids
to objects in a relation. It's the application that really
should decide about that policy.
in fact the unique ids aren't assigned to the
Hello Stephan,
done that, it's issue No 485
Saturday, November 12, 2005, 12:54:21 PM, you wrote:
SR On Friday 04 November 2005 11:50, Adam Groszer wrote:
I think I have something for tomorrow's bug day. It is not working
again. I have the current trunk and brand new instance.
SR Could you
Am Samstag, 12. November 2005 18:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
The good thing about IntIds is that it leaves the objects
untouched, the bad thing is that it creates a hard coupling
between the integer id that is used to *refer* to the object
and the key that is used to *represent* the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 11 November 2005 12:15, Tres Seaver wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Log message for revision 40048:
use a specific revision of the Zope 3 trunk for now until we have some
sort of tag available (e.g. a
Helmut Merz wrote:
Am Samstag, 12. November 2005 18:00 schrieb Jean-Marc Orliaguet:
My
impression is that you are thinking of a reference engine
rather than a relation engine
Maybe I just don't see the difference... (There is one, of
course, but I doubt it is really of relevance in
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:53:23AM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 07 November 2005 10:18, Brian Sutherland wrote:
Please don't check this in yet, I want to review the problem before you
do, because I think specific interfaces are just nuts unless we have a
very good reason.
Thanks Stephan,
Here is the test:(test_ramcache.py)
class TestStorage(TestCase):
def test_getEntry(self):
--snipped--
def test_getEntry_do_cleanup(self):
from zope.app.cache.ram import Storage
s = Storage(cleanupInterval=300, maxAge=300)
object = 'object'
key = ('view', (), ('answer',
FYI (this is mostly for the benefit of the Five folks), I've created a
Zope 2.9 branch from the trunk as of about 10 minutes ago. This branch
is frozen for feature work; it may need some changing of externals to
reflect what we want the initial version of Zope 3 that we want 2.9 to
ship with. I
--On 12. November 2005 22:08:38 -0500 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
FYI (this is mostly for the benefit of the Five folks), I've created a
Zope 2.9 branch from the trunk as of about 10 minutes ago. This branch
is frozen for feature work; it may need some changing of externals to
25 matches
Mail list logo
