On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:43:30PM -0500, Gary Poster wrote:
| Come to think of it, maybe it would also be an interesting approach
| to a baked web site delivery system.
Indeed, that's an idea. In fact, this is just what we are doing here
at Enfold.
We have created 'Entransit' [1] which
Chris Withers wrote:
A big -1 from me.
This is yet more complexity and more stuff that Zope shouldn't try to
do. If you want to serve flat files, use Apache.
From my understanding this is not only about serving flat files.
OTOH I think that it may be possible to make Apache to do this:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
To serve content from the filesystem we use a custom Publication
object that returns a different root 'application' object and from
there we use custom IBrowserPublisher and ITraversable adapters that
lookup files on the filesystem and construct simple stub objects to
Shane Hathaway wrote:
An idea just occurred to me. I think others have probably had similar
ideas, but didn't express it in the right place or time.
Part 1: Let's put an Apache-like web root (similar to
/var/www/localhost/htdocs/) in Zope instance homes. It might be called
browser or www.
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Wade Leftwich wrote:
+1 from the standpoint of promoting corporate adoption, especially when
combined with first-class citizenship for RDBMS. (In the corporation I
work for, anyway.)
Yes, RDBMS would become a first-class citizen. New users would be able
to write
On Thursday 09 February 2006 13:40, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Any thoughts or gut reactions?
Gut reaction: Very cool.
As long as we can easily also have the traditional way I would love to see a
prototype in a branch.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts
On Thursday 09 February 2006 13:40, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Any thoughts or gut reactions?
Gut reaction: Very cool.
As long as we can easily also have the traditional way I would love to see
a
prototype in a branch.
Regards,
Stephan
+1
I want the best of all worlds, ZODB, RDBMS, ORM,
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2006 13:40, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Any thoughts or gut reactions?
Gut reaction: Very cool.
As long as we can easily also have the traditional way I would love to see a
prototype in a branch.
Cool! I'll start thinking deeper about it, then.
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:40:51 -, Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
An idea just occurred to me. I think others have probably had similar
ideas, but didn't express it in the right place or time.
Part 1: Let's put an Apache-like web root
Part 2: Let's add some ZCML directives
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:30:29PM -, Martin Aspeli wrote:
| So, I'm serving static content like Apache, I'm interpreting file types
| like Apache and I'm using .htaccess files like Apache. But I'm using Zope.
|
| Why am I not just using Apache?
| Would I be learning this beast that is
Hi,
Let me play devil's advocate for just a moment Let me run around for a
while like a headless chicken. Please don't shoot me, I'm actually quite
in love with Zope 3. But I can see myself having this argument many times
in the future, so I'd like some good answers.
As a developer, I
Martin Aspeli wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:40:51 -, Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An idea just occurred to me. I think others have probably had
similar ideas, but didn't express it in the right place or time.
Part 1: Let's put an Apache-like web root
Part 2: Let's add
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:40:51AM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
| An idea just occurred to me. I think others have probably had similar
| ideas, but didn't express it in the right place or time.
[..]
| Any thoughts or gut reactions?
My first response was cool.
My second response was: that's
Forward compatibility is a myth, it doesn't exist.
I would tend to agree. However, the degree of compatability and the time
spans in questions are under the development team's control. It may, at
some point, become more important to ensure continuity than to perfect
things. Extreme
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:39:01 -, Sidnei da Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:30:29PM -, Martin Aspeli wrote:
| So, I'm serving static content like Apache, I'm interpreting file types
| like Apache and I'm using .htaccess files like Apache. But I'm using
Zope.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:49:55PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
| Martin Aspeli wrote:
| On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:40:51 -, Shane Hathaway
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
| Why am I not just using Apache?
| Would I be learning this beast that is Zope?
|
| The content is not necessarily
16 matches
Mail list logo
