Bjorn Tillenius skrev:
Since no one else commented, I guess I could do it. Personally, I think
it's OK. As you pointed out, having an id with a leading period is not
valid XHTML, so I'd be surprised if anyone would depend on it. It'd be
good to have someone responsible for zope.formlib +1 the
Baiju M wrote:
Hi Fred,
Can you add add 'Framework :: Zope3' to category here:
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/zope.interface
Now it's not listed here:
http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi?:action=browseamp;c=515
May be we have to update that release?
No. zope.interface should not
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of Zope3 trunk 2.4 FreeBSD tmiddleton.
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.zope.org/
Build Reason: changes
Build Source Stamp: 8088
Blamelist: dobe,flox
BUILD FAILED: failed svn
sincerely,
-The Buildbot
___
Posting this here because the code in question lives in zope.testing...
After accidentally nuking my mxODBCZopeDA installation simply by running
bin/zopectl test in a zope 2.9 instance, I quickly concluded:
There is no bug. testrunner.py is behaving exactly as designed. Stale
bytecode causes
Paul Winkler wrote:
Posting this here because the code in question lives in zope.testing...
After accidentally nuking my mxODBCZopeDA installation simply by running
bin/zopectl test in a zope 2.9 instance, I quickly concluded:
There is no bug. testrunner.py is behaving exactly as designed.