Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: uniformly configurable request factories: bugfix or proposal?

2005-08-05 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 04 August 2005 23:34, Tres Seaver wrote: Shrug, this is a risky change. If something goes wrong there, a lot of code will be screwed. I agree it is fairly trivial to fix, but I would prefer it to be done right. I plan to address the entire HTTPRequest/Publication/... issue with

[Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Ruslan Spivak
Hello. For those who is interested, i created blog entry containing 'timeit' benchmarks results for Python and C versions of AdapterLookup: http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/ruslan_spivak/2005_08_05_adapterlookup_c There is also test script attached there. By my estimations(i hope i'm not

[Zope3-dev] [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Call for Papers -- OSS Database Conference]

2005-08-05 Thread Stefane Fermigier
Original Message Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Call for Papers -- OSS Database Conference Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:55:54 -0700 From: Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: PostgreSQL Project To: pgsql-announce@postgresql.org Software Support Verlag,

Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Benji York
Ruslan Spivak wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch. That's about a 0.25

Twisted integration (was Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: uniformly configurable request factories: bugfix or proposal?)

2005-08-05 Thread Gary Poster
On Aug 5, 2005, at 6:27 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 04 August 2005 23:34, Tres Seaver wrote: Can you point me to the discussion of the tradeoffs involved in moving to Twisted? I have not written the proposal yet, but you can play around with the branch if you like. Then

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: uniformly configurable request factories: bugfix or proposal?

2005-08-05 Thread Gary Poster
On Aug 4, 2005, at 11:34 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 04 August 2005 22:40, Gary Poster wrote: When trying to determine a plug point for some functionality we were contemplating, Fred Drake and I were surprised to

Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 05 August 2005 09:46, Benji York wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the

[Zope3-dev] Re: uniformly configurable request factories: bugfix or proposal?

2005-08-05 Thread Derrick Hudson
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 06:27:51AM -0400, Stephan Richter wrote: [...] | Jim already convinced me to leave zserver has an alternative. Not quiet sure | how I will do this, but I hope it will be as easy as switching a few options | in zope.conf. This sounds like a good place to use WSGi. If

[Zope3-dev] Re: AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephan Richter wrote: On Friday 05 August 2005 09:46, Benji York wrote: By my estimations(i hope i'm not wrong :) C version gives ~20-26% speed up for different methods. Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests

Re: [Zope3-dev] AdapterLookup C optimizations 'timeit' benchmarks

2005-08-05 Thread Ruslan Spivak
В Птн, 05/08/2005 в 09:46 -0400, Benji York пишет: Ruslan Spivak wrote: [...] Running the functional tests for a Zope 3 based systems with 434 tests yielded (best of 3) a time of 1:12.51 for the trunk and 1:12.32 for the branch. That's about a 0.25 percent improvement. Unfortunately that