Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
I'm guessing that this is an issue because you install
Zope's into site-packages and you don't want a Zope installed
package to clobber a package that is separately packaged. Is that right?
The normal way to install Zope is in it's own
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
While it's true that this is normal for you and me, I think the cause
of zope is just a library is much helped if we *also* consider it
normal for Zope to be installed into site-packages.
I'm not convinced that Zope is just a library. Certainly,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:10:52AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Martijn Faassen wrote:
| Jim Fulton wrote:
[...]
| I'm guessing that this is an issue because you install
| Zope's into site-packages and you don't want a Zope installed
| package to clobber a package that is separately packaged. Is
Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
But the app server does use parts of Zope 3 that *are* libraries, so
perhaps we should start thinking about splitting things up somehow?
Yes, somehow. :) (I wish I had time to master eggs )
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python
Derrick Hudson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:10:52AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Martijn Faassen wrote:
| Jim Fulton wrote:
[...]
| I'm guessing that this is an issue because you install
| Zope's into site-packages and you don't want a Zope installed
| package to clobber a package that is
| In zopectl:
| [...]
| if __name__ == '__main__':
| run()
| [...]
|
| What kind of return-statement/exception i have to use?
You should add a 'sys.exit(exit-code)' somewhere. Where to add it is
the question.
--
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems, LLC.
http://enfoldsystems.com
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:27:18AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, wrt versions, it seems to be a common practice to treat different
versions as separate packages. For example, on my Ubuntu system,
Berkeley DB 4.2 and 4.3 are treated as separate (sets of) packages.
Yes it is common, but the
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:35:11PM +0100, Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:51:04AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
I am willing to consider a 3.2.1 release for this *after* the final.
That would also be fine.
OK, if you want to proceed with this, then we'll do that.
