Now that I've had a week or so to recover from making the Zope 3
releases, I'd like to look at how we did on our first timed releases.
Of course, the releases didn't happen in December. In fact, the Zope 2
Windows release still hasn't happened.
That we were late isn't a great surprise, given
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:36:35AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| And then there are the Windows releases. Making Zope 2 windows releases
| is very painful and there don't seem to be many people willing to help.
| We've avoided the pain for Zope 3 by being less ambitious. We let distutils
| do most
On 1/18/06, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These were some of my reactions to this first attempt at time-based releases.
What do other folks think?
I think early January is an understandable delay, considering that
midwinter celebrations came in the way. Great work everyone!
--
Lennart
--On 18. Januar 2006 07:36:35 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the future, if someone introduces a major change, they *must* be
committed to be available to deal with issues that arise during the
release cycle. Perhaps we need to pick different release dates to
avoid holidays.
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:36:35AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| And then there are the Windows releases. Making Zope 2 windows releases
| is very painful and there don't seem to be many people willing to help.
| We've avoided the pain for Zope 3 by being less ambitious. We
Andreas Jung wrote:
...
The basic problem with the windows release is that there is currently
nobody in charge for the windows release (although Tim is again doing
working on the Windows side, ALL HAIL TIM).
I'll repeat or emphasis that the windows release process needs to
be simple enough
--On 18. Januar 2006 10:31:03 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
...
The basic problem with the windows release is that there is currently
nobody in charge for the windows release (although Tim is again doing
working on the Windows side, ALL HAIL TIM).
I'll
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:37:12PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
| I'll repeat or emphasis that the windows release process needs to
| be simple enough that *I* can do it.
|
| Well, that's a perfect goal :-) But my experience with doing slightly
| simple programming tasks on Windows is that Windows
Jim Fulton wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
...
I think 2.9.0 is the _real_ 2.9 beta which will be widely used by ppl :-)
I could be wrong, but if we stick to a 6-month release cycle for feature
releases, I don't think there is going to be much appetite for bug-fix
releases, except in extreme
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:45:20AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| | People up to now have come up with systems like this that they thought
| were
| | automated enough. That's why we don't have a 2.9 release for
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
...
| As I said before, the fact that we don't have a windows release
| is proof that the process isn't automated enough.
That's not a proof that the process is not automated enough. The
transition from python2.3 to 2.4 *is* non-trivial because python
changed from
I moved the proposals I made last week to the wiki. The mapping is
listed below. I have implementations for all of them and will
probably check them in tomorrow sometime barring further discussion.
I did have one qualm with the auth proposal, as I described and
implemented it. As before,
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Any objections to this proposal?
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/EnhanceTracebacksInPersistentLogs
+1
One issue though is that I want to replace ZConfig with a ZConfig format for
zcml.
(This would include making ZCML extensible to
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 11:27, Martijn Faassen wrote:
How do you assemble releases 'from releases'? I'm not sure I understand
that. You mean make a Zope 2 release using a Zope 3 release?
I'll note that SchoolTool greatly benefits from the current release
On 1/18/06, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If eggs work out, as I hope they will, I'd like to stop work on
zpkg and just use eggs.
+42
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.fdrake at gmail.com
There is no wealth but life. --John Ruskin
___
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 19:09, Jim Fulton wrote:
You know my position concerning the repository and the release; I'd
prefer them to be kept as similar as possible to simplify the release
process. I hope we can go in that direction. It also makes things more
predictable to developers.
Marius Gedminas wrote:
* I can copy the URL and paste it directly into a browser
* I can right-click on the URL, and choose Open in web browser from
the popup menu that GNOME terminal gives me.
What do you think about changing Zope 3 server startup messages to show
URLs instead of
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:37:41PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Any objections to this proposal?
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/EnhanceTracebacksInPersistentLogs
+1
(I would like the test runner to use extended tracebacks as well.)
Marius Gedminas
--
This
18 matches
Mail list logo
